Does The U.S. Supreme Court Get Its FACTS From CNN and MSNBC?

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, we have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators, from coronavirus. I’ve not heard this on Fox News which some of its personalities lean somewhat left. But if there were 100,000 children in serious condition, many on ventilators, I would have heard about it on Fox&Friends. So the question is, does Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, get her FACTS from CNN or MSNBC? 🙄

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Friday from federal lawyers and attorneys representing a coalition of Republican-led states that are pushing back on the requirement. The Biden administration argues the mandate will keep Americans safe even as the COVID-19 omicron-variant surge continues. Video credit, KERO-22/YouTube.

Breitbart reports: The Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor made several factually false statements during oral arguments Friday at the Supreme Court, as the justices considered challenges to President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandates, including a mandate on large private employers.

Fact Check: Blatantly False! Tweet credit, Greg Price.

Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle (myocardium) that is alleged to be caused by the covid-19 vaccine. University of Utah Health Communications reported on 01/03/22, Post-vaccine myocarditis and pericarditis are more common among young people ages 12 to 21 years old. According to a study published by the American Heart Association.

The fact is only about 4,000 children are in the hospital from the coronavirus. So my question as stated in this article’s first paragraph does Justice Sotomayor get her Facts from CNN or MSNBC? If so our country is in big trouble. Anyone with the slightest common sense doesn’t watch either of these networks, much less are dependent on them to report the truth! 😆

U.S. Supreme Court
The Current U.S. Supreme Court Justices as of 01/08/21. Image credit, KTLA5.

Business Insider reports: At least 11 U.S. senators and 34 representatives held shares in 2020 of another COVID-19 vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer. Two representatives or their spouses held shares of Moderna during the same year that the world went on lockdown in response to the pandemic. Lawmakers held these investments in COVID-19-minded companies as Congress was at the center of pandemic relief efforts. In 2020 and 2021, members of Congress voted on six relief bills together worth nearly $6 trillion. Congress also authorized more than $10 billion to help drug companies develop and distribute vaccines and forced health insurers to cover the cost of getting the shot!

big pharma heads supreme court
It’s also all about the Benjamins as U.S. senators and representatives hold big pharma stocks. Image credit, Business Insider.

My take on this is. Folks that are fully vaccinated and boosted and getting the Covid-19 Variant Omicon. Guess It’s easy for them to say the Biden Admin’s jabs do not work. I remember back in July 2021 when I got vaccinated with Pfizer it was said to prevent getting covid again. With all the hype about boosters, I went to CVS where my original jabs came from, and were denied the booster shot because it had not been six months since my second vaccination. So since it’s now in the supreme court’s hands, I’m a little nervous considering what Justice Sonia Sotomayor said! 🙁

This website and its media content reflect my personal opinion. I simply call it, Florida Cracker style, t just like I see it, with no beating around the bush or sugar-coating applied. It is a large conservative political collection that contains many MAGS-related posts and many archived privately hosted videos and archived MAGA rallies.

12 Thoughts to “Does The U.S. Supreme Court Get Its FACTS From CNN and MSNBC?”

  1. Irate Nate

    I must be horribly misinformed, because I thought the job of the Supreme Court was to decide on the constitutionality of issues brought before it, and not the latest methods of fighting a virus.

    1. Doc's Websites

      That’s ole senile Joe and his handlers trying to rewrite our constitution! 🤬

  2. Larry Folds

    SCOTUS needs to move out of DC and open business in the middle of the country to get away from all the Marxist noise.

  3. Larry Folds

    Sotomayor has a diabetes problem. I have been praying for years that she just effing die and go away. I hate lefty communists and she is one of the worse.

  4. John A Tardy

    It doesn’t matter whether the vaccine prevents death or hospitalization. If a mandate is in the interests of the people, then fine, make a it LAW! and require Congress to do that. But to attempt backdoor it through some asinine OSHA mandate is not constitutional. Workplace safety means safe machinery, safe processes, clear warnings of dangerous areas, and a safe environment. If we’re going to now throw vaccination status into the pot, then where does it end? Sounds like next year we’ll need to mandate a flu vaccine. And gosh, we can’t take the risk of unhealthy people operating dangerous machinery, so we’ll need to mandate yearly doctor checkups. We’ll need to mandate blood pressure screenings, obesity maximums, blood sugar checks for diabetes, etc. Actually, we’ll probably have to mandate daily exercise regimens sort of like the military requires. We’ll need to mandate minimum sleep periods before work, maximum and minimum dietary intake, bowel movement regularity checks. Since these sorts of OSHA compliance mandates cannot actually be guaranteed without constant oversight, we’ll have to mandate barracks living for all workers and drill instructors to maintain discipline and guarantee compliance in all the aforementioned mandates.

    OSHA’s mandate isn’t just a slippery slope towards a police state, it’s a greased slide.

    1. Doc's Websites

      John, thanks for your excellent comment. I agree 100% Biden’s people are clueless!

  5. Lawrence

    They all read the Washington post.

    1. Doc's Websites

      Bezos The Washington Compost! 💩

  6. Marbran

    Just demonstrates that fact that anyone can serve on the SCOTUS. Sotomayor was an affirmative action, racial, gender hire. Everyone knows that.

    1. Doc's Websites

      That’s another reason a huge red wave is needed in 2022-2024! ❤️

  7. D3F1ANT

    What facts? You think the SCOTUS relies on facts? They just rubber-stamp the Left’s tyranny to give it the luster of legitimacy.

    1. Doc's Websites

      Rubber-stamping sounds about right!

      I read somewhere that Merric Garland had a part of Donald Trump’s big tech lawsuit being thrown out of court. Anyone know about this?

Leave a Comment